What I Did I took a messy, spreadsheet-heavy process for tracking cargo and transformed it into a decision-making tool that 85% of users found easy to use on their first try.
The Result Phase 1 validated with an 85% ease-of-use rating and 100% stakeholder alignment. The behavioral design approach made competitors willing to share data, a problem no spreadsheet had solved in years.

Helping competing port operators share cargo data by turning a fragmented, phone-based workflow into a platform they actually trust enough to use

Port operators were managing cargo workflows across competing organizations through phone calls and manual spreadsheets, creating costly delays and cognitive overload.

I transformed this fragmented system into a unified digital platform. Each user role gets exactly the information they need to act.

Industry
Transportation / Logistics
Client
Leidos
Timeframe
2025 – Present
Status
Phase 1 Validated · Phase 2 Design & Integration Underway
My Role
Lead UX Designer
Team
PM, Solutions Architect, 2 Engineers
Tools
Figma
Methodology
Agile Product Delivery
PCIS port logistics platform dashboard displaying shipment status cards, hazardous cargo flags, and role-based navigation for terminal operators and dispatchers

The Privacy Gap

Ports are competitive. Terminal operators and cargo owners are often afraid to share data for fear of losing their edge. This leads to endless phone calls, wasted truck trips, and massive delays.

My job was to design a system that felt safe enough for competitors to share data, but simple enough for stressed operators to actually use. I used Behavioral Science to solve a trust problem, not just a UI problem.

Learning from the Competition

Before designing, I performed a Competitive Audit of 4 legacy port management systems to understand why they were failing to solve this problem.

What I found in other systems

Three Users. Three Behavioral Principles.

I used Behavioral Science to solve a trust problem, not just a UI problem. Each user had a distinct mental model and a specific reason not to engage.

Carlos, Terminal Operator

Cognitive Load: I replaced his cluttered spreadsheets with Exception-Based Alerts. Instead of seeing thousands of containers, the UI only flags the issues that need his attention right now.

David, Cargo Owner (BCO)

Psychological Safety: To fix the fear of data leaks, I built Privacy-First Data Masking. He can share a status (Ready/Delayed) without revealing the private value of his cargo to competitors.

Maria, Dispatcher

Reducing Uncertainty: I replaced her 20+ daily phone calls with a Real-Time Sync dashboard, giving her total control over truck scheduling without leaving her desk.

Human-Centered Organization

I moved away from the "tabular fatigue" common in legacy port systems by prioritizing how users scan for information under pressure.

From Spreadsheets to Action Cards

I replaced 15-column tables with a Card-Based Architecture. The Cargo Unit ID anchors the top-left of each card, matching the natural reading path of the human eye.

This spatial chunking lets operators process one shipment at a time, eliminating the row-blur that causes errors in spreadsheet views.

Design for High-Stakes Environments

I approached Section 508 Compliance not just as a legal requirement, but as a core safety feature for the port's unique physical environment.

Scalable Component Architecture

Three distinct user roles. One shared component system.

Standardized card templates, status indicators, and alert patterns flex across Terminal Operator, Cargo Owner, and Dispatcher views without custom builds for each.

Breaking Up the Wall of Text

Legacy systems use tiny, cramped rows where every line looks identical. To find one container, you have to read 50 lines of the same text.

Legacy PCIS interface: dense spreadsheet-style table with uniform rows showing shipment data, making it difficult to distinguish priority items at a glance

Legacy systems bury critical info in high-density tables, making it hard to spot emergencies.

Redesigned PCIS card layout: each shipment rendered as a distinct visual card with status badge, action button, and color-coded priority indicator

My design uses a card-based layout to highlight the Status, making the screen scannable in high-stress environments.

Stakeholder Validation

I presented the design to 7 stakeholders across three states via remote task-based walkthroughs. Participants included Terminal Operators and Vendors.

I facilitated each session and gathered real-time feedback using System Usability Scale assessments and open-ended qualitative questions.

The Final Scorecard

The system passed the validation criteria, proving that the Behavioral Design approach effectively lowered the barrier to data sharing.

85% Ease of Use, 6 out of 7 stakeholders agreed the system was easy to understand and use
100% Alignment: Every participant confirmed the platform successfully met their high-stakes professional requirements.
57% Immediate Benefit: Over half the group identified specific performance gains for their home ports within the first walkthrough.

Evidence-Based Iterations

The study transformed the project from a Proof of Concept into a Roadmap by identifying key friction points.

Focus Area Stakeholder Feedback UX Strategy Response
Industry Jargon Preferred "Appointment" over "Booking" for cargo pickup. Standardized Mental Models: Aligned UI copy with literal port floor vocabulary.
Workflow Tracking Users wanted to see their "spot" in the overall process. Process Visualization: Redesigned the header to show a linear status indicator.
Operational Scaling Must handle up to 300 separate truck operators. Performance Design: Validated that the card layout remains scannable under high data loads.

Impact & Future Roadmap

Phase 1 success secured immediate investment and an expanded scope.

PCIS evolved from a contested data-sharing concept into a validated, 508-compliant platform with multi-state buy-in.

The Future Roadmap

Based on usability findings, I'm currently leading Phase 2 design within an agile cadence. I collaborate with engineering in refinement sessions to scope feasibility before committing to a sprint.

Phase 2 is focused on: